active-negative active-positive ambition breakthrough politics collegial system of management style competitive pattern of management style cycle of decreasing influence cycle of increasing effectiveness demagoguery Executive Reorganization Act of 1938 |
formalistic pattern of management style integrity management style minimalist model multiple advocacy passive-negative passive-positive Pendleton Act of 1883 "politics-as-usual" Presidential Transitions Act of 1963 |
psychobiography regime time relatedness self-reliant model spoils system strategic competence style (Barber) White House Office of Communications White House Press Office world view |
We have seen a variety of theories that have been offered to help explain how well a president performs while in office. Most notably we saw how character, competence, and context each offer an explanation for presidential performance. Briefly discuss how each of these help to explain an individual president's success at governing.
Compare and contrast the governing process for presidents and prime ministers. What similarities does each type of chief executive face and how do their situations differ?
Describe the relationship that exists between the presidents and their party. Citing historical examples, explain how this relationship changed over the years and why.