Measures of significance only give us an educated guess about the likelihood of a relationship in the population, and we can never be 100% certain about our conclusion unless we are actually dealing with population data.
and HØ for the population is really: | If our conclusion is: | |
---|---|---|
Reject HØ | Fail to reject HØ | |
True | We've committed a Type I Error | No Error |
False | No Error | We've committed a Type II Error |
Reject HØ | = Conclude that there really is a relationship. |
Fail to Reject HØ | = Conclude that there really is no relationship. |
The trick is, of course, that we don't really know what the "truth" is. That's why we deal with probablities when we look at measures of significance. Recall that the probability value given with these measures represents the probability that the null hypothesis (HØ) is true.
So, if we reject the null hypothesis, the probability value also represents the probability that we've committed a Type I Error.