POLS 2120
Political Parties
Second Exam Review

Campaign Finance


Party in the Electorate
Parties in State elections

Terms you should know:
agency agreements
aggregate party competition
Buckley v. Valeo
bundling
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
coordinated expenditures
dealignment
district-level competition
FEC v. CO Republican Federal Campaign Committee
FEC v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
hard money
independent expenditures
leaners
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
Michigan Model
party identification
polarization
realignment
soft money
transient populations
two-tiered party system


The exam will feature one of the following essay questions. Your best bet is to be prepared to answer each of them. Furthermore, it is not wise to try to anticipate which one I will select because the decision will be a random choice.

  1. Over the last 40 years there has been a significant change in the way in which campaigns are financed in the United States. Briefly discuss these changes and how they have affected the role that political parties play in campaigns.
  2. One dramatic phenomenon in American politics over the last 40 years is the widely perceived dealignment of the party in the electorate. Briefly review the evidence regarding the changing importance parties to the voters and discuss what this evidence means in terms of voters' attitudes toward the parties, their assessments of individual candidates, and in how they ultimately cast their vote.

  3. To varying degrees, the electoral fates of state political parties can be relatively autonomous from those of their national level counterparts. Explain what this means and why it seems to be the case. What explanations have been offered to account for the variations across states in the degree of this autonomy.